Instead of sitting down with the leader of our one sure ally
in the Middle East, Obama went on o chat with desperate New York housewives
from The View, then made another guest appearance on The Late Show with David Letterman. President Obama’s priorities
are disturbing in their gross negligence of or ghastly indifference to the
fraught Arab-Israeli conflict with its looming existential threat to Israel,
both along her borders and from potential airstrikes.
It was bad enough that the vocal popular vote during the
Democratic National Convention sought the removal of God and Jerusalem as
capital of Israel from the party platform. However, Obama moved in suddenly to
block the hostile policy move, yet the damage has been done. From the 2010
shellacking of Congress to the 2011 flip of New York’s 8th Congressional
District from disgraced Democrat Anthony Weiner to Republican Bob Turner, to the
chilly talks between Obama and Bibi, the President and the Democratic party are
losing ground as they continue sending at best a mixed message regarding the
United States’ relationship with Israel.
Unfortunately, Congressman Henry Waxman (D-Los Angeles) has now
stepped into the growing political fiasco, adding insult to injury, from claiming
that Jewish voters will support Romney because they “want to protect their
wealth” to connecting Netanyahu’s aggressive diplomacy with meddlesome
intervention in the United States Presidential election. Regarding the first
comment, House Majority leader Eric Cantor properly faulted Waxman’s
assessment, indicating that Jewish voters understand all too well Obama’s
foreign and fiscal policies, both of which are failing.
In no way do I claim that Mr. Waxman is anti-Israel or
anti-United States. Like many of his Jewish colleagues, he has voted on
resolutions supporting Israel’s right to exist, and he also acknowledges the
measured two-state solution to resolve the Arab-Israeli conflict. He even
assiduously asserted his patriotism in response to 2010 primary Congressional
candidate Marcy Winograd’s invidious remark that Waxman was “pro-Israel” at the
expense of the United States.
Still, Mr. Waxman has joined with his House Jewish colleagues to indict Prime
Minister Netanyahu for presumably meddling in this country’s presidential
election. Outgoing Congressman Barney Frank has even alleged that Netanyahu is
pro-Romney and wants to help tip the election in the challenger’s favor.
Notwithstanding these rumors, the Israeli Prime Minister has repeated on news
programs that he is motivated by the “Iranian nuclear calendar” as opposed to
the “American political calendar.”
Sadly, Mr. Waxman is paying more attention to the latter:
I think there are some
Jewish voters that are voting Republican. They've been moving in that
direction. And those that would be most influenced to vote for Romney because
of [President Obama's decision not to meet with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu] are probably already voting for Romney.
Iran is taking steps toward nuclear capabilities, yet the
President of the United States has failed in soft power and hard-liner diplomacy
to take a stand against the fanatical religious theocracy in Tehran. Israel has
taken charge in the face of existential threats, with the Prime Minister
highlighting in bold his stern stance against a nuclear Iran proliferating in
the Middle East. Mr. Waxman prefers to stand with his President and his party
instead of supporting the Israeli Prime Minister’s rational yet final determination
to thwart and Iranian nuclear holocaust.
President Obama and Congressman Henry Waxman have made a
boo-boo when it comes to Bibi, accusing the Prime Minister of playing politics
and pushing President Obama’s abysmal record on foreign policy to the forefront
in demanding a red line for Iran.
Mr. Waxman, repudiate your stance against the Israeli Prime
Minister. President Obama, put politics aside and stand by our ally in the
Middle East before Iran arms itself with nuclear weapons. Our country and the international community deserve nothing less.
No comments:
Post a Comment